咖啡學堂 / 烘焙知識 / 咖啡烘焙中的對流、傳導與輻射:Aillio Bullet R1 / R2 上的熱傳

咖啡烘焙 · 2 / 12

咖啡烘焙中的對流、傳導與輻射:Aillio Bullet R1 / R2 上的熱傳

本文是該文章的一部分 烘焙知識 C. 熱與 RoR 控制 系列。

本文是該文章的一部分烘焙知識 C. 熱與 RoR 控制 系列。

本文介紹了咖啡烘焙中三種主要的熱傳導方式:傳導、對流和輻射。它也解釋了如何從 Aillio Bullet R1 / R2 的角度來掌握這些概念。為了使這些想法更容易掌握,我還將簡要提及其他型別的烘焙機如何加熱,以便我們可以比較不同烘焙系統之間的差異。

然而,本文的主要焦點仍是 Aillio Bullet。不同的烘焙機有不同的設計、熱源、滾筒結構和操作邏輯。沒有長期使用,很難對一臺機器做出真正公正、準確的判斷。因此,我只會以保守的方式討論其他烘焙機,並避免對我沒有廣泛使用的系統做出過於強烈的主張。

我從 2017 年開始使用 Aillio Bullet R1 進行烘焙,現在我的機器已正式成為 R2。 Café Naturêve 作為實體咖啡館也已經運作了五到六年(2026 年)。在此期間,我與來自許多不同國家的Bullet使用者和烘焙師交流了想法,其中包括來自阿肯色州的Blake。我測試過無數失敗的烘焙曲線並沖泡了數千杯咖啡。這些經驗並不代表每一個烘焙系統,但對於Aillio Bullet R1/R2的使用者來說,相信有很多觀察值得分享。

在討論 Aillio Bullet R1 / R2 上的熱傳導之前,讓我們先簡單回顧一下熱量到達咖啡豆的三種方式:傳導、對流和輻射。這些概念在一般烘焙文章中已經很常見,因此我將簡短地進行解釋。主要關注點是這些傳熱方法如何存在於烘焙環境中、它們如何加熱咖啡豆以及它們如何與其他變數相互作用。

分鐘
閱讀時間

快速常見問題

為什麼 Aillio Bullet 上的對流與熱風烘焙機上的對流不同?

神秘的漩渦煙霧創造出空靈的抽象圖案和紋理。

Bullet 上的熱量主要由感應加熱模組產生,而氣流則從周圍環境中吸取。許多 Bullet 使用者認為,進入 Bullet 的空氣在某種程度上受到感應加熱系統的影響。
由於進入的空氣與環境條件密切相關,室溫、濕度和季節的變化會直接影響 Bullet 內部的對流行為。這就是為什麼在 Aillio Bullet R1 / R2 上烘焙時,經常需要根據天氣變化進行調整。
(會員區)

熱風烘焙機總是比傳導式烘焙機更好嗎?

一名男子在咖啡烘焙店使用筆記型電腦和裝置的俯檢視。

不一定。熱風烘焙機可以更快地加熱咖啡豆並生產出非常乾淨的杯子,但更快的熱傳遞並不自動意味著更好的烘焙。每臺烘焙機都有自己的傳熱邏輯,關鍵在於掌握機器如何控制增益、損失、水分運動和風味發展。

為什麼烘焙檔案不能在不同的烘焙機之間複製?

Aillio-Bullet-R1-R2-Profile-Roasttime-衣索比亞-Momora-Natural

烘焙配置檔案不能直接在不同的烘焙機之間複製,因為每臺機器的傳熱方式不同。乾燥時間、美拉德時間、發展時間、初裂時間、RoR 行為和探頭讀數都可能根據烘焙機的設計、熱源、氣流、滾筒結構和感測器位置而變化。

熱控制不會在下降時結束。快速、均勻的冷卻有助於保護最終的烘焙質量,並使整個工作流程更加順暢。

我們的 Aillio Bullet R1 / R2 冷卻盤有助於使此步驟更清潔、更快、更穩定。

咖啡烘焙的三種傳熱方法

傳導熱:直接加熱接觸

當熱量透過直接接觸傳遞時會發生傳導。在咖啡烘焙中,當咖啡豆接觸到熱滾筒表面或其他加熱的咖啡豆時,就會發生這種情況。由於傳導取決於接觸點,因此它可以比其他部分更直接地加熱咖啡豆表面的某些部分。

傳導是滾筒烘焙的正常部分,並且不會自動成為問題。然而,當接觸熱量變得過於主導時,豆子的外層可能比內層反應得更快。這可能會導致杯子較重、風味透明度較差,或者在更嚴重的情況下,會導致與表面相關的烘焙缺陷。

對流熱:移動空氣攜帶的熱量

當咖啡豆周圍移動的熱空氣攜帶熱量時,就會發生對流。與傳導相比,對流可以更廣泛地到達咖啡豆表面,包括咖啡的不平坦區域、裂縫和細小的表面結構。

在實踐中,對流會影響咖啡豆表面乾燥的速度、水分離開咖啡的方式以及最終杯子的清潔或透明程度。更多的對流並不總是意味著更好的烘焙,但管理良好的對流效應通常有助於咖啡獲得更好的澄清度和更少的厚重感。

輻射熱:從烘焙機主體發出的熱量

當熱量從熱表面(例如加熱的滾筒、內壁或烘焙機主體)發出時,就會發生輻射。與傳導不同,它不需要直接接觸。與對流不同,它不僅僅依賴流動的空氣。

在咖啡烘焙中,輻射熱有助於咖啡豆接收的總能量,特別是當烘焙機主體完全加熱或在背對背(連續)烘焙期間。它可能有助於咖啡更快地吸收熱量,但不應將其視為均勻發展的保證。最終結果仍然取決於總熱量輸入、時間、水分運動以及熱量在整個烘焙過程中的分佈方式。

這在連續烘焙過程中變得尤其明顯。 一些 Aillio Bullet 使用者在 Roast.World 中報告,即使使用相同的咖啡、批次大小、預熱溫度和烘焙設定,第二批的進度也會更快。一個可能的解釋是,烘焙機的滾筒、面板和其他部件在第一批之後保留了更多的能量。

但是,後面的批次並不總是執行得更快;批次之間的過度冷卻也會導致烘焙機的可用熱能減少。這就是為什麼僅顯示的預熱溫度可能無法完全代表整臺機器的熱狀態。

為了避免烘焙機產生過多的輻射熱,每當我烘焙時,我將預熱溫度(PH)設定為比下一批目標PH低10°C。與此同時,我正在為下一批做準備。然後我不會重新預熱到目標 PH,直到我準備好下一批。

在下一批之前將預熱溫度設定得較低,以避免過多的輻射熱

為什麼烘焙配置檔案不能在不同的烘焙機之間複製

因為每個烘焙機的主要熱源不同,所以每臺機器加熱咖啡豆的方式也不同。

那我們要如何正確使用不同的烘焙機呢?首先,我們需要確定我們所使用的烘焙機的主要傳熱形式。主要熱源必須是基礎,而其他傳熱方式則為輔助。

幾乎每個烘焙機都同時具有傳導、對流和輻射;區別在於它們之間的比例。

幾乎每個烘焙機都同時具有傳導、對流和輻射;

我們需要做的是掌握烘焙機主熱源的優缺點,加熱咖啡的速度有多快,如何出現過熱或欠熱的情況,然後調整主熱源的輸入。只要主要熱源的輸入正確,烘焙結果通常不會太差。

此外,每個烘焙機都有不同的豆溫探針厚度和探針位置,這些差異會影響記錄的資料。 Scott Rao 在“你的豆子探針一直在騙你”中寫到了這個問題,他解釋了為什麼必須仔細解釋豆子溫度資料。

因此,來自不同烘焙機的烘焙曲線不能直接共用。當在不同的機器上烘烤時,乾燥時間、美拉德時間、顯影時間和總烘烤時間都可能完全不同。

我還記得我第一次購買Bullet R1時的情況。我當時花了很多錢去參加了臺灣經銷商的烘焙課程。課堂上,老師告訴我們,「標準烘焙」必須在第九分鐘左右(正負十秒)達到爆紅。這種說法對學生來說是嚴重誤導的。

幸運的是,我經歷了自己探索烘焙的漫長過程。想要接近「真相」和「現實」一直是支撐我一路走來的一大動力,也是我建立這個網站的主要原因之一。希望讀完我的文章後,您能有所收穫,避免走很多不必要的彎路。

為什麼 Aillio Bullet 上的對流與熱風烘焙機不同

進入 Aillio Bullet R1 / R2 的空氣在進入滾筒之前不會被火焰或其他外部熱源加熱。有人可能會說,空氣經過感應加熱板,但與火焰相比,這種熱源的動量較低。

一般來說,如果一臺機器可以稱為熱風烘焙機,空氣通常在進入滾筒之前被加熱。

子彈式烘焙機經常因無法產生足夠的對流熱量而受到批評;然而,我實際上認為這是一個優勢。考慮的因素較少,烘焙變得相對容易。

Aillio Bullet R1 R2 咖啡烘焙機,附 Natureve 冷卻託盤

當然,不同的環境溫度意味著不同的對流。但如果空氣在進入滾筒之前被進一步加熱,情況就會變得更加複雜。這就是為什麼我們說 Aillio 是一款非常人性化的烘焙機:因為你只需要或被允許控制三件事:功率、風扇氣流和滾筒速度。

一般來說,較高的環境溫度意味著整個烘焙過程中會有更多的對流。但高對流不僅意味著空氣更熱。它是三件事的綜合結果:

  1. 環境空氣的溫度
  2. 咖啡豆被空氣包圍的程度
  3. 咖啡豆暴露在熱空氣中的總時間

大多數人的問題通常是關於風扇、氣流和對流熱之間的關係。一些知名咖啡顧問也發布了有關氣流的實用付費內容。氣流肯定會影響對流熱,因此必須正確使用。使用氣流是一種權衡:過多或過少都會導致問題。氣流根據情況而變化。 它是動態的.

詳細的調節方法將在會員部分解釋。

如果對流使用得當,水分鏈不太可能斷裂。 RoR曲線會更平滑,整體烘焙時間可以縮短,重量損失可以顯著減少,咖啡可以變得更加多汁,味道更飽滿,同時非常乾淨。

水滴代表對流如何影響 Aillio Bullet 咖啡烘焙中的水分鏈

我在這篇文章中首先介紹了水分鏈的想法:
Aillio Bullet R1 / R2中的RoR:如何閱讀IBTS 和豆溫探針
]]]]]]]]]在那篇文章中,您可以掌握水分鏈如何運作以及它在烘焙過程中如何回應。

考慮到這個概念,我們現在可以看看另一個常見問題:熱風烘焙機是否真的比傳導式烘焙機更好。

熱風烘焙機比傳導式烘焙機好嗎?

不一定。熱風烘焙機可以更快地加熱咖啡豆,並且可以生產出非常乾淨、富有表現力的咖啡,但更快的熱傳遞並不自動意味著烘焙機更好。

以傳導或對流加熱的咖啡豆

基於傳導的烘焙機通常加熱咖啡豆的速度較慢。許多人夢想擁有一臺全熱風烘焙機,因為他們相信熱風機更容易控制。確實,許多著名的熱風烘焙機,像是Loring、IMF,都可以烘焙出極為美味的咖啡。然而,它們也非常昂貴。幾年前流行的北歐風格烘焙方法也更容易在熱風機上生產。正因為如此,有些人可能會認為傳導式咖啡烘焙機是低檔機器。

但由於熱風烘焙機主要依賴高溫、強風量、高速的熱風來傳遞熱量,因此其傳熱效率極高,反應速度也很快。如果控制不當,熱風烘焙機也會產生烘焙缺陷,例如翻倒和燒焦。相比之下,自從我在 2017 年開始使用 Bullet R1 / R2 烘焙以來,我幾乎從未烘焙過翻倒或燒焦的豆子。

傳統陶罐烘焙作為傳導咖啡烘焙的示例

最經典的傳導式烘焙方法是砂鍋烘焙。

在臺灣,許多人用陶罐手工烘焙咖啡,並依靠感官判斷來判斷咖啡豆的狀態。就我個人而言,我認為以這種方式精確控制風味幾乎是不可能的。還有很多自動化砂鍋炒貨機市面上有的,有的還安裝了溫度計。然而,即使有溫度計,它們仍然是半開放式的烘焙系統,比普通烘焙機更容易受到環境的影響。

我們需要明白,烘焙本質上是精確控制收益和損失。如果烘焙機是一個半開放的系統,我相信是很難控制得失的。

要更深入地掌握收益和損失,請閱讀:
兼顧收益與損失,關注回報率
一般來說,增益意味著建立熱動量,損失意味著在烘焙過程中釋放水分。

我認為,某些產地的咖啡,或是具有某些特性的咖啡,是很難在陶罐中烘焙好的。一位使用煲仔爐的咖啡館老闆曾經來過我的咖啡館。我們是朋友。他特意問我是否有某個產地的豆子。那一刻,似乎證實了這個想法。

相關詳情將在會員專區進行說明。

陶罐代表傳統傳導式咖啡烘焙的操作限制
Bullet R1 R2 Roastery by night Cafe Natureve 代表對基於傳導的咖啡烘焙的更好控制

因此,我認為煲仔飯在操作上有許多限制。從某種意義上說,Aillio Bullet 和陶罐烘焙都是基於傳導的,但 Aillio Bullet 顯然提供了更好的可控性。

在下面的文章中,您將發現砂鍋烘焙中常見的烘焙缺陷:
Aillio Bullet R1 / R2 上的烘焙缺陷

我認為與其爭論哪種烘焙機設計獲勝,不如更重要的是掌握每個系統的本質。每種咖啡都有其自身的自然導熱行為,不同的環境條件也為咖啡豆提供了不同量的能量。我們必須透過不同的調整來應對這些情況。這就是當天氣變化或生咖啡表現不同時我們仍然可以烘焙出優質咖啡的方法。

對流與傳導熱:一個簡單的乾手器範例

對於初學者來說,可能很難想像對流熱和傳導熱之間的差異。這是一個日常生活中常見的例子:洗完手後,你想把手擦乾。您會使用毛巾還是乾手器?哪一種能更快擦乾你的手?

傳導和對流形象比喻毛巾與幹手器

當然是乾手器,因為空氣可以到達手指和手掌之間的每個角落和縫隙。手指之間的空間就像咖啡豆的毛孔或不平坦的表面。隨著對流熱量的增加,咖啡豆自然加熱得更快。

您也可以從學術上掌握其中的差異:只有當豆子的一部分與滾筒或周圍的豆子接觸時,傳導熱才會影響豆子,而只要滾筒不是真空,對流熱就會持續影響豆子。因此,如果可能的話,盡可能依靠對流熱,不僅因為它更有效,而且因為風味特徵更乾淨。

輻射熱烘焙機能否保證更快的豆芯發展?

未必。

市面上一些近紅外線咖啡烘焙機強調「盡可能同時加熱豆芯和豆麵」等主張。我曾經也相信過這樣的說法。然而,隨著我烘焙經驗的積累,我開始覺得這種說法可能會產生誤導。它會讓人認為熱能可以旁路直接加熱豆心,彷彿真正做到了豆心和表面同時受熱。

更準確的描述是:近紅外線能量可以讓部分能量穿過豆子表面並被表層以下吸收,從而減少表層與內層之間的傳熱間隙。

但這並不意味著豆芯和豆麵同時受熱。

輻射熱

烘焙咖啡豆顯示輻射熱首先被咖啡豆表面吸收
陽光作為輻射熱透過輻射傳遞能量的範例

做

不是

熱

表面和核心

一起

咖啡豆不是透明介質,並且輻射能並未均勻分佈在整個豆子中。 「盡可能同時加熱豆芯和表面」這句話比嚴格的傳熱描述更接近行銷語言。

輻射熱的特徵是它不需要空氣或金屬接觸來傳遞能量。對流加熱依靠熱空氣運動,其中空氣接觸咖啡豆表面並將熱量傳遞給咖啡。傳導加熱依賴鍋爐、汽包或接觸面將熱量傳遞給咖啡。

相較之下,輻射熱可以更直接地作用於咖啡豆。透過良好的熱源設計和適當的攪拌,咖啡豆也可以更均勻地暴露於輻射熱中。同時,一些輻射能可能會穿過豆子表面並在更深的位置吸收。

但是,更高的熱效率並不能保證更好的烘焙。當熱量很快進入豆子,但水分遷移和排濕跟不上時,豆子內部和外部之間的發展仍然可能會變得不平衡。

尤其是在豆子結構足夠軟化之前,內部水分可能開始變成蒸汽,但可能無法順利離開細胞和毛孔。這會增加咖啡豆內部的壓力,也可能會滯留咖啡內部的水分,使後期開發變得不那麼乾淨。在某些情況下,這可能會產生青草味或蔬菜味的味道,或我稱之為植物苦味的烘焙缺陷.

因崩潰而產生的植物苦味

請參閱這篇文章以掌握有關植物苦味的更多資訊,這是最不令人愉快的烘焙缺陷之一:植物或綠色咖啡烘焙中的苦味

當咖啡釋放足夠的水分之前發生化學反應時,通常會出現植物苦味。

實際上,每個熱源都是一把雙面刃。某一區域的加熱方式越高效,我們就越需要掌握它可能帶來的風險。

我曾經在臺灣南部一家知名咖啡館使用近紅外線烘焙機嚐到了嚴重的植物苦味。但是,我不會因此就說某種型別的烘焙機就一定不好。每個烘焙機都有潛力烘焙出令人滿意的咖啡,只要我們掌握熱源的本質,而不是隻相信行銷語言。

同樣,即使Aillio Bullet沒有真正加熱的熱風,但如果我們掌握它的熱能特性,它仍然可以烘焙出優質的咖啡豆。

你能嚐嚐烘焙系統嗎?不同的烘焙機真的能做出同樣的味道嗎?

專案「你能嚐嚐烘焙系統嗎?」非常鼓舞人心,因為它提醒我們不要將杯味過度簡化為烘焙機的品牌或熱源的型別。在這個專案中,Anne Cooper 和 Rob Hoos 嘗試在三臺機器上匹配泛黃、初裂、顯影時間比、最終全豆顏色和底色:Probat UG15、Loring S35 和 Diedrich IR-5。然後他們用三角杯來測試烘焙系統是否可以品嚐。

咖啡品嚐會用於比較不同的烘焙系統是否可以產生相同的風味

但是,我認為這個專案也需要在它的假設範圍內掌握。雖然這三臺機器的傳熱比不同,但在烘焙過程中都涉及熱空氣。因為它們共享熱空氣作為共同的基礎,所以烘焙師可以利用熱量、氣流和節奏來引導咖啡豆在相似的時間點變黃、首次破裂和掉落,最終產生相似的全豆顏色和底色。在這樣的條件下,杯子的味道變得更接近也是可以掌握的。

然而,這並不意味著所有烘焙系統都可以使用相同的框架來掌握。像 Aillio Bullet 這樣的機器確實有氣流,並且對流熱傳遞肯定存在。然而,Bullet 並不像傳統的氣鼓烘焙機或 Loring 那樣使用加熱的熱空氣作為進入豆塊的主要熱源。因此,Bullet的熱能路徑、水分釋放節奏、RoR響應和內部豆子發展都需要單獨掌握。

這就是為什麼我相信掌握第一原則烘焙背後比記住任何特定機器的固定操作更重要。

第一原則

烘焙咖啡豆代表咖啡烘焙第一原理背後的咖啡豆結構
咖啡豆在機器內烘焙,說明為什麼第一原理比固定的機器設定更重要

事

更多的

比

機器

設定

烘焙師真正需要掌握的不僅僅是對流、傳導和輻射術語,而是每個熱源帶來的增益和損失:它提供了哪些優勢,同時又帶來了哪些風險。

當我們掌握這些更深層的原理時,我們就不太可能被機器品牌、行銷語言或美麗的曲線所引導。不同的烘焙機當然有不同的個性,但每臺機器仍然受相同的自然法則支配。掌握一切事物的本質它使我們能夠對不同的熱源、不同的咖啡豆、不同的天氣和不同的烘焙機做出反應。這才是烘焙真正需要的能力。

返回
家>>蒜泥子彈烘烤>>阿利奧子彈烘焙指南

Aillio Bullet R1 R2 咖啡烘焙機,附 Natureve 冷卻託盤

熱控制不會在下降時結束

快速、均勻的冷卻有助於保護烘焙的最終質量,並使整個工作流程更加順暢。

文章問答

為什麼 Aillio Bullet 上的對流與熱風烘焙機上的對流不同?

Bullet 上的熱量主要由感應加熱模組產生,而氣流則從周圍環境中吸取。許多 Bullet 使用者認為,進入 Bullet 的空氣在某種程度上受到感應加熱系統的影響。 由於進入的空氣與環境條件密切相關,室溫、濕度和季節的變化會直接影響 Bullet 內部的對流行為。這就是為什麼在 Aillio Bullet R1 / R2 上烘焙時,經常需要根據天氣變化進行調整。 (會員區)

熱風烘焙機總是比傳導式烘焙機好嗎?

不一定。熱風烘焙機可以更快地加熱咖啡豆並生產出非常乾淨的杯子,但更快的熱傳遞並不自動意味著更好的烘焙。每臺烘焙機都有自己的傳熱邏輯,關鍵在於掌握機器如何控制增益、損失、水分運動和風味發展。

為什麼不能在不同的烘焙機之間複製烘焙配置檔案?

烘焙配置檔案不能直接在不同的烘焙機之間複製,因為每臺機器的傳熱方式不同。乾燥時間、美拉德時間、發展時間、初裂時間、RoR 行為和探頭讀數都可能根據烘焙機的設計、熱源、氣流、滾筒結構和感測器位置而變化。

熱風烘焙機比傳導式烘焙機好嗎?

不一定。熱風烘焙機可以更快地加熱咖啡豆,並且可以生產出非常乾淨、富有表現力的咖啡,但更快的熱傳遞並不自動意味著烘焙機更好。

輻射熱烘焙機能否保證更快的豆芯發展?

未必。

你能嚐嚐烘焙系統嗎?不同的烘焙機真的能做出同樣的味道嗎?

專案「 你能嚐嚐烘焙系統 嗎?」非常鼓舞人心,因為它提醒我們不要將杯味過度簡化為烘焙機的品牌或熱源的型別。在這個專案中,Anne Cooper 和 Rob Hoos 嘗試在三臺機器上匹配泛黃、初裂、顯影時間比、最終全豆顏色和底色:Probat UG15、Loring S35 和 Diedrich IR-5。然後他們用三角杯來測試烘焙系統是否可以品嚐。

查看英文原文

This article is part of the Roasting Knowledge C. Heat & RoR Control series.

This article introduces the three main heat-transfer methods in coffee roasting: conduction, convection, and radiation. It also explains how these concepts should be understood from the perspective of the Aillio Bullet R1 / R2. To make the ideas easier to follow, I will also briefly mention how other types of roasters apply heat, so we can compare the differences between different roasting systems.

However, the main focus of this article will still be the Aillio Bullet. Different roasters have different designs, heat sources, drum structures, and operating logic. Without long-term use, it is difficult to make a truly fair and accurate judgment about a machine. For that reason, I will only discuss other roasters in a conservative way and avoid making overly strong claims about systems I have not used extensively.

I started roasting with the Aillio Bullet R1 in 2017, and my machine has now officially become an R2. Café Naturêve has also been operating as a physical café for five to six years (2026). During this time, I have exchanged ideas with Bullet users and roasters from many different countries, including Blake from Arkansas. I have tested countless failed roast curves and brewed thousands of cups of coffee. These experiences do not represent every roasting system, but for Aillio Bullet R1 / R2 users, I believe there are many observations worth sharing.

Before discussing heat transfer on the Aillio Bullet R1 / R2, let us briefly review the three ways heat reaches coffee beans: conduction, convection, and radiation. These concepts are already common in general roasting articles, so I will keep the explanations short. The main focus will be on how these heat-transfer methods exist inside the roasting environment, how they heat coffee beans, and how they interact with other variables.

mins
Reading Time

Quick FAQ

Why is convection on the Aillio Bullet different from convection on hot-air roasters?

Mysterious swirling smoke creating ethereal abstract patterns and textures.

On the Bullet, heat is mainly generated by the induction heating modules, while airflow is drawn from the surrounding environment. Many Bullet users believe that the air entering the Bullet is, to some extent, influenced by the induction heating system.
Because the incoming air is closely tied to ambient conditions, changes in room temperature, humidity, and season can directly affect how convection behaves inside the Bullet. This is why roasting on the Aillio Bullet R1 / R2 often requires adjustments as the weather changes.
(Member’s Section)

Is a hot-air roaster always better than a conduction-based roaster?

Overhead view of a man using laptop and equipment in a coffee roastery.

Not necessarily. Hot-air roasters can heat coffee beans faster and produce very clean cups, but faster heat transfer does not automatically mean better roasting. Each roaster has its own heat-transfer logic, and the key is understanding how that machine controls gain, loss, moisture movement, and flavor development.

Why can’t roast profiles be copied across different roasters?

Aillio-Bullet-R1-R2-Profile-Roastime-Ethiopia-Mormora-Natural

Roast profiles cannot be copied directly across different roasters because each machine transfers heat differently. Drying time, Maillard time, development time, first crack timing, RoR behavior, and probe readings can all change depending on the roaster’s design, heat source, airflow, drum structure, and sensor placement.

Heat control does not end at drop. Fast, even cooling helps protect the final quality of the roast and make the whole workflow much smoother.

Our Aillio Bullet R1 / R2 cooling tray helps make this step cleaner, faster, and more stable.

Three Heat-Transfer Methods in Coffee Roasting

Conduction Heat: Heat Through Direct Contact

Conduction occurs when heat is transferred through direct contact. In coffee roasting, this happens when coffee beans touch the hot drum surface or other heated beans. Because conduction depends on contact points, it can heat certain parts of the bean surface more directly than others.

Conduction is a normal part of drum roasting, and it is not automatically a problem. However, when contact heat becomes too dominant, the outer layers of the bean may respond faster than the inner layers. This can lead to a heavier cup, less flavor transparency, or, in more serious cases, surface-related roast defects.

Convection Heat: Heat Carried by Moving Air

Convection occurs when heat is carried by hot air moving around the coffee beans. Compared with conduction, convection can reach the bean surface more broadly, including the uneven areas, cracks, and small surface structures of the coffee.

In practice, convection affects how quickly the bean surface dries, how moisture leaves the coffee, and how clean or transparent the final cup may feel. More convection does not always mean a better roast, but a well-managed convective effect often helps the coffee develop with better clarity and less heaviness.

Radiation Heat: Heat Emitted from the Roaster Body

Radiation occurs when heat is emitted from hot surfaces, such as the heated drum, inner walls, or roaster body. Unlike conduction, it does not require direct contact. Unlike convection, it does not rely only on moving air.

In coffee roasting, radiant heat contributes to the total energy received by the beans, especially when the roaster body is fully heated or during back-to-back (continuous) roasting. It may help the coffee absorb heat more quickly, but it should not be treated as a guarantee of even development. The final result still depends on total heat input, time, moisture movement, and how heat is distributed throughout the roast.

This becomes especially noticeable during back-to-back roasting. Some Aillio Bullet users have reported in Roast.World that the second batch progresses faster even when using the same coffee, batch size, preheat temperature, and roast settings. One likely explanation is that the drum, faceplate, and other parts of the roaster retain more energy after the first batch.

However, later batches do not always run faster; excessive cooling between batches can also leave the roaster with less usable thermal energy. This is why the displayed preheat temperature alone may not fully represent the thermal state of the entire machine.

To avoid excessive radiation heat from the roaster, whenever I roast, I set the preheat temperature (PH) 10°C lower than my target PH for the next batch. In the meanwhile, I prepare for the next batch. Then I do not re-preheat to the target PH until I am ready for the next batch.

Set the preheat temperature lower before next batch to avoid excessive radiation heat

Why Roast Profiles Cannot Be Copied Across Different Roasters

Because every roaster has a different main heat source, each machine heats coffee beans in a different way.

So how can we use different roasters properly? First, we need to identify the main heat-transfer form of the roaster we are using. That main heat source must be the foundation, while the other heat-transfer methods assist it.

Almost every roaster has conduction, convection, and radiation at the same time; the difference is the ratio between them.

Almost every roaster has conduction, convection, and radiation at the same time; the difference is the ratio between them.

What we need to do is understand the strengths and weaknesses of the roaster’s main heat source, how quickly it heats the coffee, how over-heating or under-heating appears, and then adjust the input of the main heat source. As long as the input of the main heat source is correct, the roast result usually will not be too bad.

In addition, every roaster has a different bean probe thickness and probe placement, and these differences affect the data being recorded. Scott Rao has written about this issue in “Your Bean Probe Has Been Lying to You,” where he explains why bean temperature data must be interpreted carefully.

Therefore, roast profiles from different roasters cannot be shared directly. When roasting on different machines, drying time, Maillard time, development time, and total roast time can all be completely different.

I still remember when I first bought the Bullet R1. I paid quite a bit of money to take a roasting class from the Taiwanese distributor at the time. In the class, the instructor told us that a “standard roast” must reach first crack at around the ninth minute, plus or minus ten seconds. That statement was seriously misleading for students.

Fortunately, I have gone through the long process of exploring roasting on my own. Wanting to get closer to “truth” and “reality” has been a major motivation that supported me along the way, and it is also one of the main reasons I built this website. I hope that after reading my articles, you will gain something valuable and avoid many unnecessary detours.

Why Convection on the Aillio Bullet Is Different from Hot-Air Roasters

The air entering the Aillio Bullet R1 / R2 is not heated by a flame or another external heat source before it enters the drum. Some people may say that the air passes over the induction heating board, but compared with a flame, this kind of heat source has lower momentum.

Generally speaking, if a machine can be called a hot-air roaster, the air is usually heated before it enters the drum.

The Bullet roaster is often criticized for not producing sufficient convection heat; however, I actually see that as an advantage. With fewer factors to consider, roasting becomes relatively easier.

Aillio Bullet R1 R2 Coffee Roaster With Natureve Cooling Tray

Of course, different ambient temperatures imply different convection. But if the air is further heated before entering the drum, the situation becomes even more complex. That is why we say the Aillio is a very user-friendly roaster: because you only have to, or are allowed to, control three things: power, fan airflow, and drum speed.

Generally speaking, higher ambient temperature means there is more convection throughout the whole roasting process. But high convection is not only about hotter air. It is the combined result of three things:

  1. the temperature of the ambient air
  2. how much the beans are surrounded by air
  3. the total amount of time the beans are exposed to hot air

Most people’s question is usually about the relationship between fan, airflow, and convection heat. Some well-known coffee consultants have also released practical paid content about airflow. Airflow certainly affects convection heat, and it has to be used properly. Using airflow is a trade-off: too much or too little can both cause problems. Airflow changes depending on the situation. It is dynamic.

The detailed adjustment methods will be explained in the Member’s Section.

If convection is used properly, the moisture chain is less likely to break. The RoR curve will be smoother, the overall roast time can be shortened, weight loss can be significantly reduced, and the coffee can become juicier, fuller in flavor, and very clean at the same time.

Moisture droplets representing how convection affects the moisture chain in Aillio Bullet coffee roasting

I first introduced the idea of the moisture chain in this article:
RoR in the Aillio Bullet R1 / R2: How to Read IBTS and Bean Probe
Coffee roasting is, in many ways, the process of controlling the moisture chain from the outer layers of the bean toward the inside. In that article, you can learn how the moisture chain works and how it responds during roasting.

With that concept in mind, we can now look at another common question: whether hot-air roasters are truly better than conduction-based roasters.

Are Hot-Air Roasters Better Than Conduction-Based Roasters?

Not necessarily. Hot-air roasters can heat coffee beans faster and can produce very clean, expressive cups, but faster heat transfer does not automatically mean the roaster is better.

coffee bean heated in conduction or convection

Conduction-based roasters usually heat coffee beans more slowly. Many people dream of owning a full hot-air roaster because they believe hot-air machines are easier to control. Indeed, many famous hot-air roasters, such as Loring and IMF, can roast extremely delicious coffee. However, they are also very expensive. The Nordic-style roasting approach that became popular a few years ago is also easier to produce on hot-air machines. Because of this, some people may think that conduction-based coffee roasters are lower-grade machines.

However, because hot-air roasters mainly rely on high-temperature, high-volume, high-speed hot air to transfer heat, their heat-transfer efficiency is extremely high and their response is fast. If they are not controlled properly, hot-air roasters can also create roast defects such as tipping and scorching. In contrast, since I started roasting with the Bullet R1 / R2 in 2017, I have almost never roasted beans with tipping or scorching.

Traditional clay pot roasting as an example of conduction-based coffee roasting

The most classic conduction-based roasting method is clay pot roasting.

In Taiwan, many people roast coffee by hand in clay pots and rely on sensory judgment to read the state of the beans. Personally, I think it is almost impossible to control flavor precisely this way. There are also many automated clay-pot roasting machines on the market, and some of them have thermometers installed. However, even with a thermometer, they are still semi-open roasting systems and are affected by the environment more than ordinary roasters.

We need to understand that roasting is essentially about precisely controlling gain and loss. If a roaster is a semi-open system, I believe it is difficult to control gain and loss.

For a deeper look at gain and loss, read:
Pay Attention to RoR While Thinking About Gain and Loss
Broadly speaking, gain means building thermal momentum, and loss means releasing moisture during roasting.

I believe that coffees from certain origins, or coffees with certain characteristics, are extremely difficult to roast well in a clay pot. A café owner who uses a clay pot roaster once visited my café. We are friends. He specifically asked me whether I had beans from a certain origin. At that moment, it seemed to confirm this idea.

Relevant details will be explained in the Member’s Section.

Clay pots representing the operational limitations of traditional conduction-based coffee roasting
Bullet R1 R2 Roastery by night Cafe Natureve representing better control in conduction-based coffee roasting

Therefore, I believe clay-pot roasting has many operational limitations. The Aillio Bullet and clay-pot roasting are both conduction-based in some sense, but the Aillio Bullet clearly offers much better controllability.

In the article below, you will find common roast defects in clay-pot roasting:
Roast Defects On The Aillio Bullet R1 / R2

Rather than arguing which roaster design wins, I think it is more important to understand the nature of each system. Every coffee has its own natural heat-conducting behavior, and different environmental conditions also supply different amounts of energy to the coffee beans. We must respond to these conditions with different adjustments. This is how we can still roast good coffee when the weather changes or when the green coffee behaves differently.

Convection vs Conduction Heat: A Simple Hand-Dryer Example

For beginners, it might be hard to imagine the difference between convection and conduction heat. Here is a common example from daily life: after washing your hands, you want to dry them. Would you use a towel or a hand dryer? Which one dries your hands faster?

Conduction and convection image metaphor towel vs hand dryer

Of course, it is the hand dryer, because air reaches every nook and cranny between the fingers and palms. The spaces between your fingers are just like the pores or uneven surfaces of a coffee bean. With more convection heat, coffee beans naturally heat up faster.

You can also understand the difference academically: conduction heat affects the beans only when part of the bean is in contact with the drum or with surrounding beans, while convection heat affects the beans continuously as long as the drum is not a vacuum. Therefore, if possible, rely on convection heat as much as you can, not only because it is more efficient, but also because the flavor profile is cleaner.

Does a Radiant-Heat Roaster Guarantee Faster Bean-Core Development?

Not necessarily.

Some near-infrared coffee roasters on the market emphasize claims such as “heating the bean core and bean surface as simultaneously as possible.” I used to believe this kind of statement as well. However, as my roasting experience accumulated, I began to feel that this wording can be misleading. It can make people think that heat energy can bypass the bean surface and directly heat the bean core, as if the core and the surface could truly be heated at the same time.

A more accurate way to describe it would be this: near-infrared energy may allow part of the energy to pass through the bean surface and be absorbed below the surface layer, thereby reducing the heat-transfer gap between the surface and the inner layers.

However, this does not mean the bean core and bean surface are heated simultaneously.

Radiant Heat

Roasted coffee beans showing that radiant heat is first absorbed by the bean surface
Sunlight as an example of radiant heat transferring energy through radiation

Does

Not

Heat

Surface and Core

Together

Coffee beans are not transparent media, and radiant energy is not distributed evenly throughout the entire bean. The phrase “heating the bean core and surface as simultaneously as possible” is closer to marketing language than a strict heat-transfer description.

The characteristic of radiant heat is that it does not need air or metal contact to transfer energy. Convection heating relies on hot-air movement, where the air contacts the bean surface and transfers heat to the coffee. Conduction heating relies on a boiler, drum, or contact surface to transfer heat to the coffee.

In comparison, radiant heat can act on coffee beans more directly. With a good heat-source design and proper agitation, coffee beans may also be exposed to radiant heat more evenly. At the same time, some radiant energy may pass through the bean surface and be absorbed at a deeper position.

However, higher heat efficiency does not guarantee a better roast. When heat enters the bean very quickly, but moisture migration and moisture exhaust do not keep up, the development between the inside and outside of the bean may still become unbalanced.

Especially before the bean structure has softened enough, internal moisture may begin to turn into vapor, but it may not be able to leave the cells and pores smoothly. This can increase internal pressure inside the bean and may also trap moisture inside the coffee, making later-stage development less clean. In some cases, this can create grassy or vegetable-like notes, or the roast defect I call vegetal bitterness.

vegetal bitterness from a crashing ror

See this post to learn more about vegetal bitterness as one of the least pleasant roast defects: Vegetal or Green Bitterness in Coffee Roasting

Vegetal bitterness often appears when chemical reactions progress before the coffee has released enough moisture.

In reality, every heat source is a double-edged sword. The more efficient a heating method is in one area, the more we need to understand the risks it may bring.

I once tasted serious vegetal bitterness at a well-known café in southern Taiwan that used a near-infrared roaster. However, I would not say that a certain type of roaster is necessarily bad because of that. Every roaster has the potential to roast satisfying coffee, as long as we understand the nature of the heat source instead of only believing marketing language.

In the same way, even though the Aillio Bullet does not have truly heated hot air, it can still roast excellent coffee beans if we understand its heat-energy characteristics.

Can You Taste the Roasting System? Can Different Roasters Really Produce the Same Flavor?

The project “Can You Taste the Roasting System?” is very inspiring because it reminds us not to oversimplify cup flavor into the brand of the roaster or the type of heat source. In that project, Anne Cooper and Rob Hoos attempted to match yellowing, first crack, development time ratio, final whole-bean color, and ground color on three machines: the Probat UG15, Loring S35, and Diedrich IR-5. Then they used triangle cupping to test whether the roasting system could be tasted.

Coffee tasting session used to compare whether different roasting systems can produce the same flavor

However, I think this project also needs to be understood within its assumptions. Although the three machines had different heat-transfer ratios, all of them involved hot air in the roasting process. Because they shared hot air as a common foundation, the roasters could use heat, airflow, and pacing to guide the coffee beans into yellowing, first crack, and drop at similar time points, and finally produce similar whole-bean color and ground color. Under those conditions, it is understandable that the cup flavors became closer.

However, this does not mean all roasting systems can be understood using the same framework. Machines such as the Aillio Bullet do have airflow, and convection heat transfer certainly exists. However, the Bullet does not use heated hot air as the main heat source entering the bean mass in the same way as a traditional gas drum roaster or a Loring. Therefore, the Bullet’s heat-energy path, moisture-release rhythm, RoR response, and internal bean development all need to be understood separately.

This is why I believe understanding the first principles behind roasting is more important than memorizing the fixed operation of any specific machine.

First Principles

Roasted coffee beans representing the bean structure behind first principles in coffee roasting
Coffee beans roasting inside a machine, illustrating why first principles matter more than fixed machine settings

Matter

More

Than

Machine

Settings

What roasters truly need to master is not just the terms convection, conduction, and radiation, but the gain and loss each heat source brings: what advantages it offers, and what risks it creates at the same time.

When we understand these deeper principles, we are less likely to be led by machine brands, marketing language, or beautiful curves. Different roasters certainly have different personalities, but every machine is still governed by the same natural laws. Understanding the nature of all things is what allows us to respond to different heat sources, different beans, different weather, and different roasters. This is the ability that roasting truly requires.

Back to
Home >> Aillio Bullet Roasting >> Aillio Bullet Roasting Guide

Aillio Bullet R1 R2 Coffee Roaster With Natureve Cooling Tray

Heat Control Does Not End at Drop

Fast, even cooling helps protect the final quality of the roast and make the whole workflow much smoother.

返回烘焙學習路徑 → 全部文章 →
買咖啡禮盒烘焙設備小9店長咖啡學堂咖啡文章購買與聯絡竹山門市CAFÉ NATUREVE · FROM SEED TO CUP店長:小9課程、業務接洽 LINE:@066tascy